Home

About BoF


Articles


Buy

Contact

Forum

Archives

Links


The Myth of Nightclubz

From BoF Issue 2

It's a Saturday night
.  You recline on your couch, jumper dusted with the scattered remnants of a formally full tube of Pringles.  A suspicious stain besmirches your left trouser leg.  Your eyes tire and glaze at the various television channels shouting nonsense at you.  Something itches at the back of your brain.  Flicking stations with ever increasing velocity, the images coalesce to a single blurred mass, communicating one ineluctable message.  The itch reveals itself:  you're not in a nightclub, sadsack. 

The horror of this realisation is not to be underestimated.
  Late 20th century culture elevated the nightclub to the zenith of all human joy, synonymous with the sort of Dionysian ecstasy only experienced by naked orgiastic heathens after a particularly good mushroom harvest.  If you're not 'out' on a Saturday night you are a social pariah, a gingham swaddled spinster cursing the outside world or a flabby train enthusiast living with mother's skeleton down in the basement. Or so the nightclub fascists would have you believe.  If you want to be alive, go to a nightclub the advertising tells us – Witness the slow motion euphoria where sweat becomes alluring rather than unhygienic, sliced lemon is tossed to land in some transparent elixir, not down someone's wrinkled cleavage, mouths agape exulting in the joy of the nightclub.

Exposed to this propaganda a nightclub virgin would no doubt be hammering on the door of any Gatecrasher establishment eager for a taste of the best human existence can offer.
  Yet a little more research yields a slight contradiction.  Our novice clubber, possibly in attempt to find news of the best nightspot in his area, simply types ‘nightclub’ into the BBC news site.  No doubt many a story of delight will be reported; ‘Man weeps with joy in nightclub’ or ‘Milk of human kindness new hit behind bar’ perhaps.  Unfortunately, what greets the eye instead are 139 pages of stabbings, fights, shootings, assaults, glassings, maimings and general death.  A gulf opens between the image and the reality as a veritable clubbing Gomorrah presents itself: 

Police investigate fight at a nightclub in which man was stabbed; man punched in face as he queued to get into a nightclub; three people arrested following a shooting at a nightclub; Man stabbed in brawl outside club; man suffers a head injury after being hit with a bottle outside a club…

And so on, and on and on.
  Perhaps a passing glance at Booze Britain or Vomit UK on the cable TV could show the nightclub in a better light.  However, one can only watch a half clothed drunken woman beating her bloodied partner with a high heeled shoe so many times before the urge to hang oneself really kicks in.  Exotic variations on common assault illustrate how the nightclub really brings out the creative impulse in people.  Here at the BoF we can’t decide whether “Former conflict management trainer jailed for driving Jeep Cherokee through nightclub doors after being ejected” is appalling or hilarious.  We ere on the side of hilarious.  However, ‘clubber's nose stitched up after being bitten in unprovoked attack’ is a little more sobering.  Indeed, far from the advertised Nirvana, it seems the word ‘nightclub’ and the phrase “ear bitten off” fit together a little too snugly. 

How, then, has this disparity developed?
  Are our pleasant night spots unfairly maligned by the forces of fusty conservatism?  Or is there an international conspiracy afoot to turn the country’s youth into a race of ad hoc olfactory surgeons?  Let us at the BoF paint a fair and honest portrait of the British nightclub scene in an effort to illustrate the truth.

Nightclubs tend to fall into two broad categories:
  1) a place people who wear clothes for a living go to take cocaine or 2) hellholes where common people drink themselves to the point of death.  The two species can intermingle, but generally you know where you are with this categorisation; either severely out of pocket at 2 in the morning having paid £20 for one vodka and coke, or severely out of blood after being glassed on the dance floor.  Indeed, it is possible to devise a graph of the journey from Coke head heaven to bleeding hellhole.


Naming plays an important role in establishing a club’s place in this entertainment stratum.
  Clubs named after signifiers of upper class standing are, paradoxically, the most awful.  Beware a Toffs, a Butlers or a Duke, as they are invariably the last place you would find a toff, a butler or a duke.  Similarly, those nightclubs which dub themselves Atlantis or Bacchus rarely provide an experience worthy of mythmaking.  Then there are those that strive for intrigue or subversion, like ‘Niche’ or ‘Fusion’.  You go along yet find yourself neither intrigued nor subverted by another large building that emits a loud noise and sells overpriced booze.  Nightclubs also offer frequent support for the great cause of national illiteracy with a dyslexic zeal for a pluralizing ‘z’ or ‘x’; Chancerz or Trax being notable, hideous examples.  It seems that the golden rule of nightclub nomenclature is to remove the establishment as far as possible from the reality of its situation with the most inappropriate of titles.  It must be the hoped that the glamorous connotations of an Icon or a Diva will rub off on places that would be more accurately named ‘Cirrhosis’, ‘Whorz’ or possibly ‘Stabbinz’.

Once the minefield of duplicitous naming is negotiated and the least despicable nightspot selected, the awfulness continues with the challenge of actually getting through the doors.  The BoF would love to refute the stereotype of a gorilla in a suit and overcoat nightly indulging in whichever prejudice tickles his fancy.  Sadly, stereotypes exist for a reason and the brush of the hairy knuckle is inescapable as Kong must first approve of your footwear and general appearance before letting you past.  (Why establishments called Panama Browns would care what shoes their clientele sport remains a mystery)

If confrontation with Egor and chums is successfully avoided the gates to euphoria are open.  However, it becomes clear that levels of euphoria are divided by gender.  Men have a great dilemma on entering the nightclub.  Women can view the art of dance as liberating or celebratory, and not necessarily a short cut to copping off.  Even if it is carried out around the totem of a handbag.  Men, however, are keenly aware that dancing is something done by gays, and no man must place himself open to this accusation.  Unless he is gay, then he can have a whale of a time.  Should the male nightclub goer not be of the homophile persuasion two methods are employed to circumvent the problem.  There is the fail safe of the glum shuffle, attempting to remain as inconspicuous as possible.  This effectively deflates the ‘you’re a big gay’ jibe from insecure comrades, but unfortunately does not inspire adoration in the opposite sex.  Method two seems much the more popular, which may just possibly be influenced by vast consumption of alcohol.  This involves being as gay as possible to illustrate how you are clearly not a homosexual.  Lots of exaggerated camp manoeuvres and dance floor grappling with your similarly non-gay friends spell this out.  Novices may forget to accompany such behaviour with a humongous guffaw after any buttock grasping, crotch grabbing or fellatio miming, just to underline the point that ‘we’re not gay’.  Observing such groups of men can be a moving experience, as the Englishman’s reticence for tactility is broken down and fraternal ties can really form with some good old fashioned ass squeezing.  Any homoerotic tensions can safely be exercised outside by beating someone senseless.

Non-gay credentials established, the male nightclubber can then begin the complex, subtle nuances of modern human mating rituals.
  Such complexities cannot be contained within the small scope of one essay.  But they can in
this nifty flowchart though!

Having negotiated the above intricacies, our clubbers are free to indulge in an hour or two of suck face, before popping down the nearest alleyway to consummate the burgeoning romance.

                                                                * * *

On his website, professional security consultant Chris E McGoey states “nightclubs are designed to be hospitable social meeting places”.
  The fact that hospitable social meeting places require the services of a professional security consultant is somewhat paradoxical in itself, but surely nightclubs are the least hospitable and most anti-social of places imaginable.  Putting to one side the abundance of violence and vulgarity, hospitable social meeting places tend not to obliterate the hearing with 80 decibels of computerised shite.  It’s difficult to socialize when your ears are bleeding, you’ve shouted yourself hoarse and slur every third word.  Perhaps in the not too distant future, evolution will ensure that it is those not with the biggest brains, nor even the biggest cocks that will successfully procreate but those with the biggest lungs (apart from certain nightspots in the north east of England where lopping out one's cock and swinging it around in time with the music is positively encouraged).

Hand in hand with the hospitable and social nightclub goes the disturbing phenomena of ‘vertical drinking’ where clubs, and their bastard offspring, bars, attempt to cram as many shot guzzling, wallet happy consumers into as small and loud a space as possible.
  With one aim of course, the maximization of profit.  Vertical drinking is surely as ill suited to conviviality as ‘inverted drinking’ where socialising folk are bound at the ankles and suspended from the ceiling as they attempt to converse and sup beer.  And packing drunk people together in the entertainment equivalent of a storage container (or quite possibly an actual storage container) is always a good idea:

Health officials and police are calling for more tables and chairs in the pubs of Preston, in Lancashire, to cut down on so-called "vertical drinking”.
  They said the trend can lead to fights as people are jostled and drinks are spilled in crowded establishments.

Oh good, just what a nightclub needs, more fighting.
  Perhaps encouraging people to enjoy a meal at a nightclub would help this situation.  No doubt the altruistic evening entertainment’s industry only objection would be for the declining profits of traditional late night cuisine proprietors.  It would take a heart of stone to see Kahled’s Kurried Kerbabz put out of business, for as the night draws to a close, the urge to procure a tasty late night snack from out of a trailer becomes irresistible.  Munching hungrily, you let the melodic hum of a portable generator fade into the distance, attempting not to fumble the stray dog offal and relish sandwich as you grapple with similarly encumbered drunkards in an attempt to stuff yourself into a taxi and get home without troubling the emergency services.

Raving noise pioneers the KLF describe, in 3am Eternal, the epiphanic moment when, off one’s tits in a field, ‘The doors of perception are open. Things happen.’
  Transported to the urban hell of 21st century nightclubbing 2am Despair is more apposite.  The point towards the end of the evening when the doors of Blazuz are closed and things happen.  Fighting, mainly.  Having failed to impress with jumping, shouting or poison ingesting capabilities, and witnessing the objects of your desires departing into the night, you are expelled into the cold winter air, sweat and desperation evaporating off your under clothed body like a last-placed racehorse.  The despair and frustration is worked off with either a bleak walk home or the flailing embarrassment of post club scuffling.  Or, as our friends at the BBC ably document, a good bit of stabbing, shooting and murder.

And thus is the evening complete.
  Picking his way through this regurgitated, post pugilistic, post coital detritus, our nightclubbing novice would no doubt wonder how a once civilized country such as ours has been reduced to this.  Years of socio-economic study and costly research programmes would be able to tease out the complex nuances of shifting demographics and societal change to reach tentative but well supported conclusions.  The BoF sees things differently and blames Disco.

Pre-disco, nightclubs and dancehalls didn’t pretend to be reflections of Hollywood or celebrity and embraced the shabbiness of British life.
  Tables, chairs, sedate eight piece bands playing the hits of the day as chaste love birds exchanged furtive glances with each other before discretely going at it in the nearest Anderson shelter.  Then on strutted Saturday Night Fever and every evening dancer was sold the myth that once through the doors they are the star they’ve always imagined themselves to be.  Striking the pose that says you are the dance floor god and this is your Zion.  It is perhaps little surprise that clubs and drugs go together so well as the club is an hallucination in itself.  It tricks the brain into thinking it is inside the head and body of young Tony or Stephanie as an evening out becomes less about dance and more about exhibition.  Importantly, it is youthful exhibition.  Anything youthful is, of course, stupid, driven by a primal urge to annoy one’s parents.  Staying out late, drinking and entering a dress like a slag contest (male or female) and indulging in promiscuous sex are guaranteed to add lines to the worrisome parental visage.  Sadly, gaining admittance to the nightclub has become a new rite of passage as fights, drunk and drugged experiences are the status symbols of the playground as youth attempt to grow a personality along their emergent breasts or newly distended testicles.  Getting into a nightclub racks up the juvenile kudos points like little else, marginally outscored by loosing your virginity on the school playing field having your stomach pumped.  (Combine all three in one night and you get a special badge) 

What is most unfortunate about this youthful triumph is that people of 40 plus are now compelled to act like 18 year olds for an evening out, creating a society that is enthral to an easily exploitable juvenile mentality.
  Middle aged women cram themselves into flimsy pole dancer chic, with hair bleached to a perfect straw-like consistency and faces mummified by several layers of wrinkle filling foundation.  Men who, twenty or thirty years ago, would have been content nurturing pigeons or gluing together elaborate models of HMS Victory are now trussed into Ben Sherman shirts and expensive jeans that look like rags, middle aged girth resting uncomfortably on the overpriced denim designed for the virile hips of much younger men; their bellowed laughter masking a cry of loneliness and despair as the alcohol leeches out of their pores like tears.

As the music pounds and the lights blaze, the nightclub compels people, young or old, to act out of character.
  It smells, it is too loud, too crowded yet the people have been sold the message ‘this is it’.  A cognitive dissonance develops as the gap between what you feel and what you are told to feel widens.  Against your will you salivate over Bikini clad staff while the sense of cosmic humiliation burns, compounded by the absurd sight of seeing someone semi naked trying to break up a fight.  And this emotional fissure is only healed by increasing the levels of intoxication and the resultant brawling, or occasionally whooping falsely into the stultifying air, a werewolf whose transformation is brought about by a deadly combination of WKD and Eric Prydz rather than shifting lunar phases.

As you mash yourself into the ever increasing wall of flesh, short sleeved shirts and stilettos that form an impenetrable barrier between you and half a pint of carling, it dawns on you that the Nightclub is nothing more that the brand of alcohol.
  It is a myth, it is advertising and as such promotes inadequacy and inferiority in order to boost sales.  The toned, honed and beautiful people of the nightclub poster and TV advert are in reality the sweat soaked, sallow skinned and pot bellied beasts we long to escape becoming.  And above all else it wants our money.  Alcohol makes you ill, fat and unhappy, so the nightclub experience is created to give it the good looking hard sell. Whether high class chic or piss stained dross, a nightclub exists because of the variety of intoxicating substances on offer.  Thriving on self loathing you must leave yourself in the cloakroom and have your pockets rifled through, imbibe various noxious brews and pretend to be something you are not.  Paying a fine proportion of your wage in the process. Furthermore, the myth extends into the day.  People use the nightclub experience as a fresh plate of armour for Monday morning, telling all and sundry how well they have conformed by lying in the gutter covered in vomit; longing for the next night to be great you pass the weekend test by how well you have poisoned yourself.  The nightclub myth has created a generation of people who live for the weekend so they can escape the tedium of their workaday existence, but the weekend falls inexorably short because it is there simply to sell alcohol.  Dissatisfaction and despair grow in parallel to sales figures. 

                                                                 * * *

The current incarnation of the nightclub appears to have grown from the sun soaked hedonism of Ibiza, where young Britains took the opportunity to embrace several millennia of foreign civilization by drinking, taking drugs and having sex in public.
  However, with as much sarcasm as is possible to convey in print, the BoF can proclaim that any form of popular music that emerges from out of Europe is a guarantee of quality.  If the reputation of the nightclub was not bad enough, it’s implication in national decline is truly unforgivable.  Why did the British decide to embrace and treat seriously what always used to unite the nation - the mockery of Europop?  This combination of dreadful continental sounds and English violence was a match made in somewhere like Redcar and soon people of all ages were flocking to home grown equivalents.  Not being the most astute tracker of ‘largin’ weekend manuvaz’, the BoF again welcomes the unsubstantiated expertise of Wikipedia:

Far and away the most important element of the house drumbeat is the (usually very strong, synthesized, and heavily equalized) kick drum pounding on every quarter note of the 4/4 bar, often having a "dropping" effect on the dance floor.

Yes, we’ve all left a concert proclaiming, “Man, that drumming…” The sound favoured by the modern nightclub is one that has successfully exorcised all human emotion and melody to produce something that only someone operating in binary could truly appreciate.
  The modern nightclub handed performance over to the machines.  Ecstasy, a wonderful drug that turns a person in to a human metronome, was clearly developed to make this bearable to human ears.  But just imaging the alternative; instead of festering in call centres and office jobs, the musicians of this world could be employed to sing and play in nightclubs, reforging the bond between revelling people and live performance, deflating the maniacal urge for mass celebrity.  But that would be creative and cost money, so that’s out.

But then there is the phenomenon of cheese or retro.
  Like our gaggle of clearly not gay chaps fondling each other on the dance floor, a night of Cheese suggests a typically British reaction to the enjoyment of music and dance.  Initial sensations of awkwardness and discomfort are assuaged by pointing at people and laughing at them.  When cheese is involved mockery of the music itself will suffice.  This particularly effective in establishments which possess a balcony where pointing and laughing at people from above is a sure fire way of fitting in and avoiding personal expression.  The nightclub thrives on this low level sadistic circle, as uncomfortable people attempt to make themselves more comfortable by making people feel uncomfortable.

And because all of this takes place in the wee small hours, it feels even more uncomfortable.
  Like any diurnal animal we become edgy as night falls and quick to anger.  However, there is a remarkable lack of drink and drug fuelled trouble at theatres or salsa nights.  Possibly due to the absence of drink and drugs.  And morons.  Nyeri District Commissioner Michael Mwangi is in no doubt about the true nature of the nightclub:

Kenya's authorities have imposed a curfew in the central town of Nyeri to curb widespread crime in the area. Nyeri District Commissioner Michael Mwangi says the town has seen a rise in muggings and carjackings, which he blames on an increase in alcohol consumption and the growth of nightclubs.

And if you can’t believe the Kenyan authorities, who can you believe?
  Before heading out for your next weekly hit of clubbing just think which of the two definitions of the word is most appropriate for your evening’s entertainments; a gathering of like minded souls for discussion and banter, or a large stick that stoves in skulls?

Like any rapacious unregulated capitalist machine the nightclub eats up the competition, leaving no choice of an evening other than to stay in or feed its coffers.
  It’s monopoly on evening activities renders the question “what’s the nightlife like?” absurd.  “Well, there's small places where people stand and drink or large places where more people stand and drink.”  It is an unpleasant beast that poses as a release from drudgery whilst herding you into squalid buildings, taking your money as you pay for the privilege of poisoning yourself and loosing your hearing.  It's not about dancing, it's not about a communal joy, it's about paying to drink, fight and cop off.  Which might just be your cup of tea.  Personally I'll leave that to the barbarians and get back to my pringles, couch and suspiciously stained trousers.  People of Britain– proclaim with the BoF; I have no need:  I have my wit, my love, my shelter – nightclub, be gone!  Unless there’s a good indie night on, of course.  Then I’m there…

Comment