Home

About BoF


Articles


Buy

Contact

Forum

Archives

Links



4th August 2008


Sing if you’re glad to be gay

Homophobia.  Bizarre, isn’t it?  The homophobic amongst you may disagree, but in between shaving swastikas into the back of your half cousin’s head (if you live in Illinois) or repressing your inappropriate lusts for the local vicar (if you live in Buckinghamshire) take a moment to consider why you find the gay folk around you so very startling.  Amongst the rich variety of homophobic culture, from Jim Davidson to Hitler to the Pope, there is very little that actually pinpoints why certain people are so horrified by the concept of gays and lesbians, outside of ‘eugh, bum sex’ or ‘eugh, spiky mullets’.  The nature of phobia is that it is irrational, yet many people, who possess the intelligence not to eat bricks or boil their face off each morning, continue to protest their fears as rational and justified.  Without offering any rationale or justification.  It’s a lot like a fear of spiders.  Spiders can’t hurt you; neither can gays.  Spiders are more disturbed by you than you are of them, just like gays.  It’s the scuttling way spiders move that perturbs, just as a scuttling gay can cause a homophobe to shriek and climb up the nearest lamppost.  Neither are in themselves terrifying.  Put both together, though, and you have a phobic’s worst nightmare.  Gay spiders?  Enough to send a Daily Mail reader into a confusion induced coma.   An eight legged gay?  Dear god.  Imagine Arturo the camp octoped rampaging through the Home Counties, capturing the moral majority in his vast web of gayness.  (I’m thinking we have the ideal vehicle to re-launch the career of Vin Diesel here.  Someone get me his agent’s number.)


The link between spiders and homosexuals is clear, then.  Happily for the arachnids out there, no one thinks you’re worse than paedophiles.  Hoorah.  Gays, on the other hand, have been on the receiving end of a moral fisting from respected
Northern Ireland MP and idiot Iris Robinson.  Mrs. Robinson has been getting rather confused in a game of Sexual Abomination Top Trumps (Pentecostal Christian Edition).  During a debate on the management of sex offenders, Robinson said “There can be no viler act, apart from homosexuality and sodomy, than sexually abusing innocent children.”  So, sodomy lands somewhere around the 200 point mark for vileness, out scoring child abuse by 4 points.  But wait.  Commenting in the Belfast Telegraph, Robinson causes a steward’s enquiry to be called.  “I cannot think of anything more sickening than a child being abused. It is comparable to the act of homosexuality. I think they are all comparable. I feel totally repulsed by both.”  So it’s all evens.  The scores for both homosexuality and child abuse now read: Vileness 200, Nausea 127, Repulsion 50.  Phew, controversy abated.  We can all rest easy.  But wait just another gay baiting moment:  “The remarks in the Grand Committee report do not accurately reflect my views. While I will be seeking to check the Committee recording, what I clearly intended to say was that child abuse was worse even than homosexuality and sodomy.”  So child abuse now outranks homosexuality?  Top Trumps enthusiasts around the word throw their cards in the air in frustration and start making sweet gay love instead.

Robinson is clearly a moron for a) the whole gays are evil thing and b) taking three goes at being a moron.  Could she not get her moronism right the first time?  But again, like the terrifying gay spiders from outer space (Hello? Mr. Diesel?  Yes, we’ve just the part for you…) the startled homophobe is unable to say quite why homosexuality is sickening to them.  The best Robinson can do is “I have strong views on homosexual activity based on the Scriptures”.  Brilliant.  It says so in the bible (or the translation of the bible that condemns gay sex, rather than the translation that condemns gay prostitution.  Its a confusing old anachronism) therefore I’ve got to go and hit some gays with a bag of fish heads and mould before I can pray for peace and brotherly love on earth.
 

But why are organisations who profess to know the creator of the universe, the way to eternal salvation and the meaning of life, so hung up on bums n' cocks?  Do the scriptures say why the abominable gay is so abominable? (hoho, I think we have a cinematic trilogy here, you know)  If I can rely on Wikipedia for theological insight, they don’t, stalling at a blustering ‘why, but it’s unnatural!!”  But if the church is to pass judgement on bumming as unnatural, it must surely also rank tit wanks, blow jobs, pearl necklaces, rimming and all manner of miscellaneous pleasures on its sex abomination scale.  Now there’s a job for one lucky Priest.  Besides, anyone who’s seen the film Gladiator knows that giraffes can be gay as well, so it must be natural.  Take that Thomas Aquinas.


All of which drivel comes in the context of this week’s Gay Pride event in Belfast.  While Robinson continues to froth; “I find it amazing, if not unexpected, as these days Christians are persecuted for their views, but that will not stop me. There will be a Judgment Day.  MUAHAHAHAH ALL WILL BURN IN THE FIRES OF DAMNATION!!!*” it’s left to the city’s pre-eminent drag queen Titty Von Tramp to add a sense of perspective.  “It's such a carnival atmosphere, the biggest parade in Northern Ireland outside of the Twelfth of July marches, and we get support from so many people‼ That poor lady has her views and we have our lives. Pride is about us.”  Well said Titty.  A march in Belfast that doesn’t involve religious sectarianism, riot police, the army and cars on fire?  Iris Robinson will be annoyed.

And you would think that that’s quite enough gay controversy for one week.  But hot off the homosexual press comes news that Snickers have had to pull their latest advertisement featuring B. ‘Gay’ Baracus himself, Mr.T.  In the advert, the former A Team and… erm… the former A Team star is seen shooting popular confectionary bars at a speed walker from a truck mounted gatling gun, imploring him to ‘get some nuts’.  Nothing wrong there, surely.  There’s even some fool pitying to please the fans.  U.S. lobby group Human Rights Campaign, however, disagreed, stating that the advert condoned:


‘the notion that the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community is a group of second class citizens and that violence against GLBT people is not only acceptable but humorous’.


Muh?  As many commentators have pointed out, surely it’s speedwalkerphobic rather than homophobic.  Are Human Rights Campaign saying all speed walkers are gay?  Or that gays walk like speed walkers?  Out in internet land things get even more confusing:

“White man = gay, weak, effeminate. Black man = strong, aggressive, powerful.  Just more reinforcement that white men are stupid and "have no nuts." The jews are laughing at us.”
 

Wha?  Where do the Jews come into this?  Couldn’t it have been a GLBT and/or Jewish speed walker that Mr. T was chasing?  All this irrational prejudice, phobia and hatred is exhausting.  Thankfully, the vast majority of comments about the story have ridiculed Human Rights Campaign including “Gay here, not offended.”  Thanks gay!  Good to hear from you.  There was however, one person keen to see Mr. T pound some gay ass (so to speak):


“The guy is a FAGGOT and Mr. T made him run like a straight guy! YES!”

Iris Robinson’s internet privileges in the Northern Ireland Assembly have since been suspended.


*third sentence not necessarily accurate

     

Comment